2016年6月20日 星期一

〔聯合報〕「原味」優酪乳 87%加糖

2015-07-09 14:55 聯合晚報 記者陳麗婷/台北報導


很多民眾以為「原味」優酪乳就是無調味或熱量低,但董氏基金會調查市售23件標示原味的優酪乳、優格產品,高達87%均額外添加糖,且添加糖量最高為養樂多原味高鈣優酪乳,每100毫升添加9.3公克,喝2.2瓶就達一天所需糖量上限,添加糖量第二、第三名為植物の優原味膠原優格(8.8克)、統一AB乳果(7.9克)。
董氏調查發現,市售原味優酪乳、優格除添加糖、水、奶粉外,有些產品包裝標示發現,還添加香料、奶油、改良澱粉、洋菜等五花八門成分,所謂原味其實仍調味過。

民眾購買優酪乳、優格等產品時,多半以為挑選原味最天然,董氏基金會今天公布今年4、5月39件市售優格及優酪乳調查結果。董氏基金會營養師林彥廷表示,在23件標示原味的優酪乳及優格中,僅有三件無額外添加糖,,添加糖量最高的養樂多原味高鈣優酪乳,達每100毫升9.3公克,相當於兩顆方糖、36大卡。

董氏基金會營養師陳醒荷表示,以成人每天需2000大卡熱量計算,一天糖分攝取上限為25公克,養樂多一瓶125毫升計算,喝2.2瓶就達一天所需,但其他食物也有糖分,很容易攝取過量。

董氏調查也發現,有四件優酪乳其實是CNS3058產品(調味發酵乳),卻標示原味,包括:光泉原味零脂晶球優酪乳及原味優酪乳、統一LP33機能優酪乳、統一AB輕優酪乳應屬調味發酵乳;食藥署食品組副組長薛復琴表示,調味發酵乳卻標示原味,將了解釐清是否違反規定。

陳醒荷解釋,所謂調味發酵乳是指含乳量僅45%-90%,可能添加果菜漿、蜂蜜等,目前法規未明確規範,提醒消費者注意,並非挑選原味就代表無添加。

林彥廷也說,消費者另一項迷思是買輕優酪乳、light產品,看似熱量少,但相對含乳量也較少;39件品產品中,有四件宣稱高鈣,鈣含量約每100毫升132.2-150毫克,但明年1月起鈣含量需達180毫克。

林彥廷說,雖廠商並未違反標示相關規定,但仍提醒消費者,不要誤以為原味就是無添加、熱量低,應仔細看清楚營養標示再選購。

〔紐約時報〕美國徵兵登記,女性現在必須要登記

1.媒體來源:
紐約時報

2.完整新聞標題:
Senate Votes to Require Women to Register for the Draft

3.完整新聞內文:

國會通過女性18會時須登記在戰時會被徵招當兵。
上一次真正徵招時是越戰那次。
1月2018之後,18歲女性必須登記徵兵,要不然會有一些社會福利不能擁有。
1981美國大法官說女性不須徵兵,不過在隨著五角大廈開始開放女性參與戰鬥工作後,國會決定該開放徵兵了。

馬侃(之前有選總統)表示贊成,克魯茲(輸給川普的廢物)反對。
基本上民主共和兩黨都贊成,但是共和黨內最保守的一派是反對的。
似乎還有一些程序要走,白宮方面跟國會方面還有機會對此法案討論的樣子。


WASHINGTON — In the latest and perhaps decisive battle over the role of
women in the military, Congress is embroiled in an increasingly intense
debate over whether they should have to register for the draft when they turn
18.

On Tuesday, the Senate approved an expansive military policy bill that would
for the first time require young women to register for the draft. The shift,
while fiercely opposed by some conservative lawmakers and interest groups,
had surprisingly broad support among Republican leaders and women in both
parties.

The United States has not used the draft since 1973 during the Vietnam War.
But the impact of such a shift, reflecting the evolving role of women in the
armed services, would likely be profound.

Under the Senate bill passed on Tuesday, women turning 18 on or after Jan. 1,
2018, would be forced to register for Selective Service, as men must do now.
Failure to register could result in the loss of various forms of federal aid,
including Pell grants, a penalty that men already face. Because the policy
would not apply to women who turned 18 before 2018, it would not affect
current aid arrangements.

“The fact is,” said Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona and the
chairman of the Armed Services Committee, “every single leader in this
country, both men and women, members of the military leadership, believe that
it’s fair since we opened up all aspects of the military to women that they
would also be registering for Selective Services.”

The Supreme Court ruled in 1981 that women did not have to register for the
draft, noting that they should not face the same requirements as men because
they did not participate on the front lines of combat. But since Defense
Secretary Ashton B. Carter said in December that the Pentagon would open all
combat jobs to women, military officials have told Congress that women should
also sign up for the draft.

“It’s my personal view,” Gen. Robert B. Neller, the commandant of the
Marine Corps, told the Senate Armed Services Committee in February, that with
the complete lifting of the ban on women in combat roles, “every American who
’s physically qualified should register for the draft.”

While most Republican senators — including Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the
majority leader, and the women on the Armed Services Committee — agree with
the move, it has come under fierce attack from some of Congress’s most
conservative members.

“The idea that we should forcibly conscript young girls in combat to my mind
makes little sense at all,” Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas and the
father of two young daughters, said on the Senate floor last week.

After voting against the bill on Tuesday, Mr. Cruz said in a prepared
statement: “I could not in good conscience vote to draft our daughters into
the military, sending them off to war and forcing them into combat.”

The debate will now pit the Senate against the House, where the policy change
has support but was not included in that chamber’s version of the bill.

In April, Representative Duncan Hunter, Republican of California, offered a
provision related to women and the draft for the House version of the defense
policy bill to highlight the issue, even though he opposes the idea — then
voted against his own amendment. It passed with bipartisan support but was
stripped from the final bill in a procedural move.

“If he didn’t do this in the committee and spur the national debate, who
was going to do it?” Joe Kasper, Mr. Hunter’s chief of staff, said. “So,
mission accomplished.”

Senator Mike Lee, Republican of Utah, made a mild attempt to strip the
language from the Senate bill on the floor after the Armed Services Committee
overwhelmingly rejected a similar effort, but his amendment never received a
vote.

The two bills will now be reconciled in a conference committee between the
House and the Senate, where a contentious debate is expected.

“It may well be a topic of great controversy,” said Senator Richard
Blumenthal, Democrat of Connecticut, who serves on the Armed Services
Committee. “But it should not be.”

Military experts say that even if the efforts to compel women to enlist fails
in Congress, the issue is not going away.

“I think the change is inevitable,” said Nora Bensahel, a military policy
analyst at American University’s School of International Service, “whether
in this debate or through the courts. It just seems that now that you have
women allowed to serve in any position in the military, there is no logical
basis to say women should not be drafted.”

Conservative groups, which threatened to target senators who voted for the
policy bill, reacted with anger on Tuesday to the bill’s passage. “Allowing
our daughters to be forced into combat if there is a draft is a clear example
of Washington placing more value on liberal social engineering than military
objectives and preparedness,” one such group, Heritage Action for America,
said in a news release.

But supporters of the policy change say opponents are oversimplifying the
issue. “What people don’t seem to understand is just because there is
conscription, that does not mean that all women would serve in the infantry,”
 Senator Deb Fischer, Republican of Nebraska, said. “There are many ways to
serve our country in the event of a national emergency.”

The Senate is expected to hold its ground as conservative members defend the
status quo. Mr. McCain, whose family has a long and storied history in the
military and whose daughter-in-law is a captain in the Air Force Reserve,
said to Mr. Cruz on the Senate floor: “I respect the senator from Texas’s
view. Too bad that view is not shared by our military leadership, the ones
who have had the experience in combat with women.”


4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/15/us/politics/congress-women-military-draft.html






葛玉霞修女──再見台灣,台灣再見 一個溫馨的故事

【感恩】葛玉霞修女(Marie-Therese Felder)再見台灣,台灣再見

葛玉霞修女:我老了,不想成台灣負擔,再見台灣,台灣再見。

台東與花蓮的濱海公路上,經常可以看到一個頭纏白頭巾的女騎士,呼嘯而過,朋友戲稱
她是台東最年長的「飆車族」。多年來,擔任葛玉霞修女「傳真機」的翻譯、也是原住民
的田金玉說,為了不耽擱病患的需求,葛玉霞修女幾乎風雨無阻,從不間斷探視病患的腳
步。

葛玉霞修女(Marie-Therese Felder)瑞士人,1934年生,1955年,葛玉霞修和瑞士白冷
會的修女、神父們在瑞士醫院服務期間,因知悉台灣醫護人力不足,便自動請調至偏遠的
台灣東部服務,於同年5月5日抵達台灣,落腳於台東關山鎮,並開設診所開啟了葛玉霞於
台灣的醫療服務,那年;葛玉霞修女僅32歲。

1985年當馬偕醫院在台東市設立分院時,這些修女就決定:做台灣人不喜歡做的事-─照
顧貧窮的植物病人。就這樣,葛玉霞修女換到台東成功的小診所為當地的病人服務,特別
是阿美族年老的病人,葛玉霞修女並非於診所等待病人,而是只要知道有病人無法前來診
所看診,她就騎著摩托車訪視這些病人,每天午後三點不到,葛玉霞修女就戴上安全帽、
載著滿車裝備,全副武裝地跨機車,趕赴每一個正等待她造訪的病患家中,為他們提供居
家護理服務。

2013年,84歲的葛玉霞修女下了一個重要決定:返回瑞士度過晚年。60歲時出過車禍的修
女,因著身體的不適,不願意給大家帶來麻煩,決定在服務一年後,離開她所摯愛的台東
。很多病人和東部的居民問她為什麼不留在台灣?她說:「我不想麻煩你們。我要回瑞士
去,我們的教會有替我們這些年老的修女準備一群年輕的護理人員可以照顧我們。但現在
要離開你們,我心裡會很不捨。」

2015年6月15,葛玉霞修女告別了她所熱愛的台灣,「謝謝台灣人願意讓我照顧,我真的
很愛台灣;我老了,不想成為台灣人的負擔」,葛玉霞修女眼眶泛紅地說。

資料參考:
http://politicolfield.blogspot.com/2016/06/blog-post_12.html
http://www.hwe.org.tw/award_winners_5_2_2.asp

##EasyReadMore##